Admin
Junior Member
I Can Be Here Or There
Posts: 53
|
Post by Admin on Oct 5, 2014 7:53:55 GMT -5
www.africanholocaust.net/news_ah/jewishslave.htmlAmid massive protests in South Africa, the African National Congress in Parliament (who suffered their own long years of apartheid) is calling for the Israeli Ambassador to leave with “immediate effect” and for the South African Ambassador to Tel Aviv to be immediately recalled. But Zionism has a deep pocket and deeper ties to the economy of South Africa. Fact | Cynthia McKinney witnessed, just like America, Israeli Jails have majority African people. Genocide against Ethiopian Jews | Jewish Ethiopian women were given contraceptive injections before immigrating to Israel and after arrival. The result: a 50 percent decline in birthrate, and a ‘missing generation’ of Ethiopian children. Israel and Apartheid South Africa: Secret documents revealing offer to sell nuclear warheads to South Africa cast fresh light on alliance. Forced Conversion: The Israeli government decided by a resolution in 2003 that Ethiopians who are descendants of Jewish mothers' lineage have the right to emigrate to Israel under the Entry Law; they may become citizens only if they formally convert to Orthodox Judaism. This is supposed to be a democratic country but the law of the land forces you to leave the older African Judaism behind and adopt the 18th century Europeanized sect. When dealing with a topic as sensitive as Jews and African oppression, or any group and the oppression of another group, we must first explain the social and political factors around such a study. There are no taboos on authentic research as far as Africans are concerned and the European Jewish involvement in African enslavement seems to be a seriously controversial one further exacerbated since... the publishing of work by the Nation of Islam and Dr. Tony Martin, both are charged with being antisemitic. Along with Farrakhan, Jesse Jackson, Marcus Garvey, Cynthia McKinney, Malcolm X, John Henrick Clarke, Desmond Tutu , obviously Leonard Jeffries and almost all critics of the state of Israel, even liberal Alice Walker! This charge of anti-Semitism (which is a misnomer) cannot and must not dissuade Africans from researching into any area of history; especially when that history has traditionally been suppressed. Passionately saying "This is all antisemitic junk" or "sounds like Protocols of Elders of Zion conspiracy" can no longer be used as a defense against this discourse; the world is getting tired and bored of this dronish one-liner, and the cookie cutter drivel. It is very easy, when in control of media, to selective critique people like Farrakhan as hateful but avoid dealing with his position on a point-by-point bases. Because if the charge of antisemitism (an over-abused Zionist silencing apparatus) was satisfied every time it was invoked, no one other than pro-Zionist would be allowed to say "Jew." And make no mistake, the real issues of Israel are not "Jewish" issues, they are Zionist issues. No one should confuse Zionism and Judaism, Jewish people and Zionist. The issue is 100% with Zionism, an areligious cover for White supremacy .
|
|
Admin
Junior Member
I Can Be Here Or There
Posts: 53
|
Post by Admin on Oct 5, 2014 7:54:49 GMT -5
It has always been very easy for Africa's detractors to assemble all the hand-picked Black defenders of Zionism to act with "authority" and decry this discourse as "fringe theories". Anyone attempting to dictate what topics are viable for African scholars to research is racist as well as those who think the opinions of Africans is not noteworthy. Skipping the colorful names for Tony Martin and Farrakhan it would be far more meaningful to explore this study point-by-point. What Zionist Jews are very skilled at is cherry picking and hyperbole. Very skilled presenting examples of "all the good things they did for us Blacks" until they blind themselves to their own terrible history of racism and oppression. Citing how much someone else, like the Arabs, especially Muslims, have done far worse has always been a good defense. But the decoy of a "better devil"— true or false, as a defense cannot invalidate the necessity for any study.
Balanced respectful critique is a sign of a healthy society, and in this polarized debate some "other" opinion is necessary to balance out white-washing on one hand, and blatant antisemitic on the other. And it is a fine line, but that in itself is true for most studies on controversial topics.
|
|
Admin
Junior Member
I Can Be Here Or There
Posts: 53
|
Post by Admin on Oct 5, 2014 8:55:22 GMT -5
No African dictates the volumes of book written on Jewish history, or their views on Africa. Not one African is allowed to object to philosemitic pride. No one cries for the Arabs when Islam and slavery, Islam and anything bad, are being discussed to death. It is "freedom of speech" on the Jewish run Jihad Watch, but In Germany it is a criminal offense to use freedom of speech to "Holocaust Deny." The world seems to have to kneel before the hypersensitive, overblown, overreacting whims of a tiny Zionist population housed in Israel and America. (see Gunter Grass). Israel is free to threaten holocaust on everyone else, but it is antisemitic to even protest their right to destroy other people. philosemites boast about how great Jews are, and how much power they have, how much influence they have in Hollywood—yet, to quote them in their own words is called antisemitic. Including the mention of a Jewish/Zionist power block, a Jewish fiefdom in media and US foreign policy.
The entire history of the selfish ADL in holding back groups that service African-American development is an open record. Despite the allure of its name, the ADL is nothing more than a Zionist lobby for protecting Israeli and European Jewish interest globally. It has zero interest in Defamation outside of its own spheres of gain. The Zionist agendas of Darfur Watch are no longer a "conspiracy against Israel" As part of the usually cover up the ADL stated that Ethiopian Jews are not experiencing racism: "Whatever Israel's mistakes towards its Ethiopian Jewish community, the cause is not racism." It explains that "what causes the distress is bureaucratic ineptitude and a cultural gap between a traditional community and a modern, technologically-advanced, highly-competitive nation. It should be clear the role of the ADL in maintaining, protecting, denying anything which threatens the White constitution of Israeli society.
Many Jews/Zionist have been very vocal against anyone using "their" terms "Diaspora", "Genocide" and "Holocaust." Yet there are Jews who believe that it is all right for the Jews to borrow from the Greeks, but not all right for Africans to borrow the same concepts from the Jews. The Jews are particularly possessive about the concept of Holocaust - insisting that it must be uniquely Jewish. Yes, when the concept is from Greek to Jew - but No if it is from Jew to African (Mazrui).
|
|
Admin
Junior Member
I Can Be Here Or There
Posts: 53
|
Post by Admin on Oct 5, 2014 8:57:22 GMT -5
Is truth antisemitic? is the challenge that first has to be addressed. What is the term then for racism against African people? Where are the terminologies for Africans to articulate the 500 plus years of exploitation and humiliation caused by all forms of racism, which European Jews are not subject to? 1 billion plus Africans are less represented that a 13 million Jews. That is not the fault of the Jew, but certainly needs to be placed here in context so we can understand how is it then, we know more about Jewish experience--than the African experience. Clearly the power of one group is not represented in the demographic numbers. Those with eyes can see clearly the inequity in representation and that inequity, as with all inequity, causes resentment.
There is no part of our history that has not had some sort of negative impact from Jewish agendas, so it is strange that the relationship is sold as benign. Garvey blamed Jewish jurors and a Jewish federal judge, Julian Mack, for his conviction. In 1928, Garvey told a journalist: "When they wanted to get me they had a Jewish judge try me, and a Jewish prosecutor. I would have been freed but two Jews on the jury held out against me ten hours and succeeded in convicting me, whereupon the Jewish judge gave me the maximum penalty."
Now the Jewish Zionist revisionist historians (namely Harold Brackman on behalf of the Zionist Simon Wiesenthal Center) are trying to take the odd comment from the likes of Du Bois and place them in some pro-Israeli sling shot. They seem to think any support of ideological Zionism means support for the ongoing human rights abuses of modern Israel (especially in light of all we know today that we did not know then). But it has gone awry, the world knows the truth, and the entire history shows them to be more foe than friend.
These issues can only be healed by the truth discourse (not further obfuscation, exploitation and deceptive revisionism) and amending the evils they do against their Palestinian population and against the African liberation movement.(thanks for your advise, but no thanks)
We have dealt with Arabs, and African systems of slavery with transparency. Therefore why should African people shy away from subjects branded as third rail or sacred cow? Especially when Jewishness has never been an obstacle or inhibitor of White Supremacy. It certainly did not stop the "chosen nation" from giving full assistance to apartheid South Africa to deal with the "black problem".
|
|
Admin
Junior Member
I Can Be Here Or There
Posts: 53
|
Post by Admin on Oct 5, 2014 8:59:07 GMT -5
The relationship of Africans and Jews has always attracted great comparisons: both people of historical persecution. But only pandemic brainwashing could make Africans think Jews and them are in the same boat of oppression: European Jews have accomplish things Africans can not even dream of. Everyone knows of the Jewish Holocaust-- Jewish or otherwise, while even in Africa many do not even know about the Atlantic slave trade. They think African Americans got to America by some pleasant event. And the sad reality is it is often the case that for African-based arguments to gain validity or make a point they have to be parallel to Jewish experience to evoke empathy. So we see "would anyone expect Jews to let Nazis write their history." In an attempt to highlight how ridiculous it is for African history to constantly be written through the eyes of the slave master/dominant race-class.
It has to be stated that Jews enslaving Africans happen inside of European identity and societies. Jews did not act through independent Jewish nation unlike Arabs, some Africans, and Western Europe. This is an important factor in understanding that there is a difference between European enslavement of Africans (which contains Jewish slave masters), Arab slavery (which also contained Jewish slave masters).
Slavery in Africa (which would also contain Jewish people as victims of slavery as well as slave traders (North Africa)). Arab slavery had a "nationalist" personality by groups of people we call Arab today. So was slavery inside of Africa, it was the actions of nations such as Dahomey and Ethiopia (Abyssinia). There were no Jewish nations since the 1st century A.D, to act as a slaving nation. And this must be clarified so our understanding of this slavery is not confused, thus Jewish slave trade is more accurately termed the role of Jewish people in African enslavement, within other nations.
In examining Jewish African relations we discover a deep distrust on the part of the Africans and this distrust is not without some merit. The very hint of denying the 5-6 million who died is protected by law in some countries, no such protection protects African history. The impact of the African Holocaust is minimized at every turn, ignored denied, scuffed at with remarks such "what holocaust." "It was Africans doing it to Africans." "Only 10-12 million (arrived)." But how many left?
The African historians who write these articles for the African Holocaust Society do not not fit into any of the tidy boxes created by our detractors. And it would make their life easier if we did, because what balanced person would listen to the rants of a Neo-Nazi? But we are against war and racism, corruption and misrepresentation, we defend self-determination, and indigenous peoples rights, women rights, everyone's right to their history, culture, dialogue, research, plurality and meritocracy.
|
|
Admin
Junior Member
I Can Be Here Or There
Posts: 53
|
Post by Admin on Oct 5, 2014 9:01:13 GMT -5
We are not Black radical nationalist, Communist, Islamic or Christian Zealots, Afrocentrics or Black supremacist. Neither are we guilty by association because we take the good and the bad from everyone. Our associations and working relationships are not restricted just because someone has an issue with Nation of Islam or Libya.
In America, as actor Ben Affleck said, the way people speak about Arabs and Muslims would not be tolerated if the same things were said about Jews. The world needs one standard across the board. And shame on anyone who profits from human rights and then in their turn denies another people their human rights, dignity and voice.
Jews correctly hunt down every single war criminal and turn them out of their nursing homes to stand trial at 99 years old for crimes against humanity. And rightly so, maybe Africans have a lot to learn from how Jews handle some of their affairs. How they defend what defines them, how they made Hebrew the official language and White Judaism the official culture and religion, defending it with Nukes. Most African surrender, without even being requested, their identity and wealth.
The horrors of the African Holocaust are not minor just because Africans do not have the power of media on their side. But some Jews, such as Norman Finkelstein said, have extracted sympathy to justify the unjustifiable by mocking and exploiting their own Holocaust, and turning it into a political and economic industry. So for Africans the legacy of slavery, apartheid and colonialism has a twisted double blow in how African history is given priority in the world today.
Judaism is a solid religion which has been responsible for influencing a significant part of our morality and law. [10] As well as being the religion of the most recognized man to have ever lived — Jesus. As well as the religion of the most influential man to have ever lived Paul (aka Saul of Tarsus). It definitely absorbed much of its components from Ancient Egypt (KMT) and has continued to this day (indirectly via Christianity and Islam) to be a force in shaping our modern reality. It has been an unspoken ideological cornerstone in the formation of Islam, just as much as Islam has shaped modern Judaic theology.
So we must identify 1. Judaism (religion) and slavery, 2. Historical Jews (Mizrahi, African, etc) and slavery, and finally 3. Modern European Jews and their involvement as European people in African enslavement and oppression.
|
|